On January 23, 2026, the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of Pará (MPPA) filed a Public Civil Action (ACP) against the State of Pará, with a request for urgent relief, aiming to ensure compliance with Resolution 215/2018 of the National Council for the Rights of Children and Adolescents (CONANDA) to incorporate its guidelines into the licensing processes in the state. The Resolution establishes parameters and actions for the protection of the rights of children and adolescents at risk of being affected by the context of works and projects, including the environmental licensing phase. 

The MPPA argues that it initiated a Civil Inquiry in which it verified the non-compliance by the State Secretariat for the Environment and Sustainability (SEMAS) of Pará. As an example, it demonstrates this non-compliance in the licensing of the Marituba Sanitary Landfill, where SEMAS justified that the licensing of the project preceded the Resolution, even though the corrective licensing occurred in 2020. The MPPA addresses the relationship between the implementation of the Resolution and the realization of the principle of climate justice, insofar as environmental impacts fall disproportionately on vulnerable groups. The MPPA also cites General Comment 26/2023 of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, the 2030 Agenda, and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to support the intersection and integration between children's rights, policies, and environmental and climate protection. 

The MPPA requests, as an urgent measure, a diagnosis of the implementation stage of the Resolution's Parameters and the adoption of measures for its effective implementation, including the insertion of indicators in the Terms of Reference for licensing studies (EIA/EVTEA/EIV), the holding of specific public hearings with children and adolescents, and consultation with affected traditional peoples and communities. On the merits, the MPPA requests confirmation of the injunction.

In an interlocutory decision on February 6, 2026, Judge Aldinéia Maria Martins Barros partially granted the injunction and ordered the State of Pará to: prove the inclusion of child and adolescent protection indicators in the new Terms of Reference for licensing projects with significant environmental impact; present a diagnostic schedule for adapting ongoing licensing processes; and establish a methodology for qualified listening to children and adolescents in the impacted areas. The court also set a fine for non-compliance, to be allocated to the Municipal Fund for the Rights of Children and Adolescents of Marituba.

In its defense, the State of Pará denied any state omission, arguing that SEMAS (the State Secretariat for the Environment and Sustainability) already adopts mechanisms to protect children in the licensing process. It argues that the Resolution is a programmatic norm, without full effectiveness, that does not generate a legally enforceable subjective right. It invokes the principle of separation of powers and the need for judicial self-restraint in structural litigation, citing precedents from the Supreme Federal Court (STF) and international climate jurisprudence (Urgenda v. Netherlands, Neubauer v. Germany, and Juliana v. United States) to support the argument that courts should not replace the Executive Branch in defining technical instruments of public policy, even those sensitive to legitimate environmental and climate demands. It requests the revocation of the preliminary injunction, the acceptance of the preliminary objections, and, on the merits, the total dismissal of the action.

MPPA vs Estado do Pará (Environmental licensing and CONANDA Resolution 215/2018)

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

MPPA vs Estado do Pará (Environmental licensing and CONANDA Resolution 215/2018) - reply

Filed

Brazil

Pará

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Direct investments by the governments using public funds. This can be to support climate initiatives or integrate climate into other projects.

Codes and standards are regulatory instruments that specify minimum standards to protect health and safety. This ranges from performance standards, which prescribe outcomes while allowing flexibility to achieve compliance, to the more prescriptive approach of technology-specific standards.

Financial actors and resources that are primarily directed towards climate change mitigation, adaptation and compensation.

Dedicated pool of financial resources for climate-related projects.

Using laws and the legal system more broadly to protect vulnerable entities

Social inclusion is the process of improving the terms on which individuals and groups take part in society—improving the ability, opportunity, and dignity of those disadvantaged on the basis of their identity.

woman and genders outside of the gender binary

Any compulsory, unrequited payment to the government levied on corporations or individuals. This can be for environmental reasons, such as introducing a Carbon tax to set a price that emitters must pay for the greenhouse gases they emit.

Activities of industries that extract natural resources, such as mining, oil, and gas, for commercial use.

This sector involves managing waste treatment, sanitation, pollution control and environmental cleanup.

Activities that involve planning, designing and building infrastructure, residential, and commercial structures.

This sector involves activities that impart knowledge and skills to individuals, including formal schooling, vocational training and educational support.

MPPA vs Estado do Pará (Environmental licensing and CONANDA Resolution 215/2018) - reply

Policy instrument

Impacted group

Just transition

Economic sector

Finance