- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA ↗
22-1313United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
12/09/2022
Petition for review filed challenging notice of 2023 allowance allocations.
Petition
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA ↗
22-1025United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)8 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
08/23/2023
Motion to voluntarily dismiss filed by petitioner RMS of Georgia, LLC.
On August 23, 2023, the manufacturer filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss separate petitions for review that sought review of EPA’s notices regarding the 2022 and 2023 allocations for production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons.
Motion
07/07/2023
No. 22-1025 returned to active docket and consolidated with No. 22-1313; No. 22-1314 dismissed as time-barred and for lack of jurisdiction.
Decision
05/08/2023
Respondents filed response to petitioners' motion to govern further proceedings.
Response
04/28/2023
Motion to govern further proceedings filed by RMS of Georgia, LLC d/b/a Choice Refrigerants.
Motion
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA ↗
21-14213United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (11th Cir.)4 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
04/13/2023
Petition transferred to the D.C. Circuit.
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the allocation of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) consumption allowances under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act (AIM Act) was a “nationally applicable” action, and that the Clean Air Act therefore required that a Georgia-based manufacturer of refrigerants file a challenge to the allocation in the D.C. Circuit. The AIM Act requires the phasedown of domestic production and consumption of HFCs by capping the number of allowances allowed each year. The law directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish an allowance allocation and trading program to implement the phasedown. The Eleventh Circuit concluded that EPA’s allocation notice was nationally applicable because it allocated allowances nationwide and did not geographically restrict them.
Decision
04/01/2022
Ordered that venue issue is "carried with the case" to be determined by merits panel.
Decision
12/22/2021
Parties requested to advise the court of their position regarding the jurisdictional question.
Other
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA ↗
23-1104United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries