Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Collection

Alaska Wilderness League v. Jewell

Alaska Wilderness League v. Jewell 

3:15-cv-00067-SLGUnited States District of Alaska (D. Alaska)5 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
07/23/2015
Decision
Motion for injunction pending appeal denied.
07/22/2015
Reply
Reply filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for injunction pending appeal.
07/08/2015
Motion
Motion for injunction pending appeal filed by plaintiffs.
07/02/2015
Decision
Order regarding cross-motions for summary judgment issued.
The court upheld the regulation authorizing incidental take of Pacific walruses, including the issuance of a finding of no significant impact.

Alaska Wilderness League v. Jewell 

15-35559United States Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)3 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
12/31/2015
Decision
Order issued dismissing appeal.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal as moot after Shell announced that it would "cease further exploration activity in offshore Alaska for the foreseeable future.” The Ninth Circuit said that "dramatic changes in circumstances have rendered remote and speculative the possibility that any oil and gas exploration activity will occur ... in the less than three years" remaining before the regulation expired.
08/10/2015
Decision
Order issued.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declined to stay the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s approval of Shell’s offshore oil exploration plan for the Chukchi Sea off the coast of Alaska while a challenge to the approval is pending. The denial of the injunction was without prejudice to renewal before a merits panel. The Ninth Circuit also sua sponte expedited the appeal. The plaintiffs’ claims focus on the plan’s impact on wildlife and cites the “dramatic negative” effects of climate change on the Chukchi Sea habitat.
07/28/2015
Motion
Emergency motion filed seeking stay of incidental take regulation pending appeal.