Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Collection

Beyond Pesticides v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

In re Exxon Mobil Corp. 

21-8001D.C. Cir.6 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/23/2021
Decision
Petition for permission to appeal denied.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Exxon Mobil Corporation’s (Exxon’s) petition for permission to appeal pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act from the district court order remanding the nonprofit organization Beyond Pesticides’ lawsuit alleging Exxon violated the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act by falsely marketing and advertising its products as clean energy. The D.C. Circuit found that it was “unclear as a matter of District of Columbia law” whether Beyond Pesticides’ action was required to be litigated as a class action and that District of Columbia courts should determine how the action should proceed.
04/19/2021
Reply
Reply filed in support of petition for permission to appeal pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act.
04/12/2021
Opposition
Opposition filed by Beyond Pesticides to the petition for permission to appeal pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act.
04/06/2021
Motion
Motion filed for an emergency stay of the remand order pending appeal.

Beyond Pesticides v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 

1:20-cv-01815D.D.C.13 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/06/2021
Decision
Defendants' motion to stay denied.
03/31/2021
Opposition
Opposition filed by plaintiff to defendant's motion to stay execution of the remand order pending appeal.
03/31/2021
Reply
Reply filed in support of motion for a stay of execution of the remand order pending appeal.
03/29/2021
Motion
Motion filed by defendant to stay execution of remand order pending appeal.

Beyond Pesticides v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 

2020 CA 002532 BD.C. Super. Ct.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
05/15/2020
Complaint
Complaint filed.
A non-profit organization filed a lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court alleging that Exxon Mobil Corporation violated the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act by representing “that it engages in cleaner forms of energy at a significant level, when in fact, its core business remains entrenched in the production and delivery of fossil fuels.” The plaintiff asked the court to issue an injunction halting Exxon’s allegedly false marketing and advertising.