Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Collection

California v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management

Sierra Club v. Zinke 

3:17-cv-07187N.D. Cal., United States Federal Courts5 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/30/2019
Petition
Petition for attorneys' fees and costs filed by plaintiffs.
01/24/2018
Reply
Reply filed in support of motion for preliminary injunction.
01/23/2018
Opposition
Opposition filed to motions to transfer actions to District of Wyoming.
12/19/2017
Complaint
Complaint filed.
On December 19, 2017, 16 conservation and tribal citizen organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of California challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM’s) final rule postponing most compliance dates in BLM’s Waste Prevention Rule for one year. The Waste Prevention Rule, which was published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2016, imposed requirements on oil and gas companies to reduce the venting, flaring, and leaking of natural gas, including the greenhouse gas methane, during production activities on onshore federal and Indian leases. The organizations alleged that postponement of the compliance dates violated the Mineral Leasing Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

California v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management 

3:17-cv-07186N.D. Cal., United States Federal Courts17 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/23/2018
Appeal
Notice of appeal of preliminary injunction filed by federal respondents.
After a California federal court granted motions in February for a preliminary injunction barring the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from enforcing its rule delaying provisions of the Waste Prevention Rule, the federal respondents filed an appeal in the Ninth Circuit on April 23.
02/22/2018
Decision
Motions for preliminary injunction granted and motions for transfer denied.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California granted motions for a preliminary injunction barring the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from enforcing its rule delaying and suspending the requirements of its Waste Prevention Rule, which is intended to “to reduce waste of natural gas from venting, flaring, and leaks during oil and natural gas production activities on onshore Federal and Indian (other than Osage Tribe) leases.” The court found that BLM’s reasoning for delaying the rule was “untethered to evidence contradicting the reasons for implementing the Waste Prevention Rule” and that plaintiffs were therefore likely to prevail on the merits. The court also found that the plaintiffs had demonstrated irreparable injury based on “the waste of publicly owned natural gas, increased air pollution and associated health impacts, and exacerbated climate impacts.” The court also denied motions to transfer the action to the District of Wyoming, where a challenge to the Waste Prevention Rule is pending. The California federal court said the substantive legal issues in the District of Wyoming case were distinct from the procedural issues at issue in this action.
01/30/2018
Reply
Reply filed by North Dakota and Texas in support of motion to transfer venue.
01/30/2018
Reply
Reply filed by defendants in support of motion to transfer.

California v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management 

18-15711United States Federal Courts, United States Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
06/26/2018
Decision
Motion for voluntary dismissal granted.
06/20/2018
Motion
Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by federal defendants-appellants.