Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. Burgum

Center for Biological Diversity v. Burgum 

3:23-cv-00150United States District of Oregon (D. Or.)5 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
09/29/2025
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment granted and defendants' motion denied; case remanded for new listing determination and revised 4(d) rule vacated.
The federal district court for the District of Oregon remanded a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) final rule listing the streaked horned lark as threatened rather than endangered and vacated a Section 4(d) rule under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that extended certain ESA protections for endangered species to the lark. The court found that the listing determination was arbitrary and capricious, including because FWS failed to consider the impact that small population size presently had on the lark. Among the issues identified by the court was the final rule’s failure to “meaningfully analyze small population size in connection with climate change.” Regarding the Section 4(d) rule, the court found that there appeared to be no evidence supporting the rule’s expansion of an exception to the take prohibition for agricultural activity to the entirety of the lark’s range.
Decision
01/12/2024
Plaintiffs filed combined reply in support of summary judgment and opposition to defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment.
Reply
12/15/2023
Defendants filed cross-motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support of/in response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
10/19/2023
Plaintiffs filed motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support.
Motion For Summary Judgment