Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Collection

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. James

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. James 

1:25-cv-01738S.D.N.Y., United States Federal Courts3 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
09/08/2025
Decision
Motion to transfer granted.
The federal district court for the Southern District of New York granted a motion by the New York Attorney General and the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to transfer business groups’ lawsuit challenging New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act to the Northern District of New York. The court first noted that it was undisputed that the case could have been brought in the Northern District of New York, where West Virginia and other states and business associations had filed a challenge to the law several weeks before this lawsuit was filed. The court then determined that the transfer would serve the interests of justice and convenience of the parties and witnesses. The court concluded that the interests of justice weighed heavily in favor of transfer because the “central issues” of this case and the West Virginia case were “substantially similar such that it would be inefficient and unnecessarily burdensome to litigate them in two separate courts.” The court distinguished this determination from its previous decision denying a motion to transfer the United States’ challenge to the Climate Change Superfund Act to the Northern District of New York. The court noted the difference in plaintiff types (federal government entities versus business organizations) and the presence in the United States’ case of “several legal issues” that did not overlap with the issues in this case. The court found that other factors such as the plaintiffs’ choice of forum and convenience to witnesses and parties either weighed only slightly in favor or against transfer or were neutral. The court also found that application of the “first-filed” rule would create an unrebutted presumption for transfer.
04/25/2025
Response
Response filed in opposition to defendants' motion to transfer.
02/28/2025
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Four trade associations and business groups filed a complaint in the federal district court for the Southern District of New York challenging New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act (the Act), which the plaintiffs alleged was “a plainly unconstitutional law imposing $75 billion in strict liability on a targeted group of energy companies for their lawful conduct and the lawful conduct of third parties overwhelmingly undertaken in other jurisdictions.” The complaint alleged that the law is intended to impose strict liability for alleged impacts of climate change based on energy companies’ “purported shares of global, lawful greenhouse gas emissions based on completely unsubstantiated ‘attribution science.’” The plaintiffs asserted that the Act was precluded by the U.S. Constitution and federal law on multiple grounds, including because federal law controls liability for harms arising from interstate greenhouse gas emissions and because “the inherent structure of the Constitution of the United States recognizes the equal sovereignty afforded to all States.” They also asserted that the Clean Air Act preempts the Act and that the Act violates the Due Process Clause, the dormant Commerce Clause, the foreign Commerce Clause, the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment, and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. A separate <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/west-virginia-v-james/">challenge</a> to the Act by 22 states was already pending in the Northern District of New York.

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. James 

1:25-cv-01307N.D.N.Y.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
10/08/2025
Answer
Answer filed.