Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Spinelli

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Spinelli 

02-04106United States District Court for the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.)5 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
02/06/2009
Settlement reached.
The Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC) and the U.S. Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank) settled a lawsuit filed by several city governments and environmental groups, agreeing to consider GHG emissions that would result from the projects they finance. The lawsuit was filed by Friends of the Earth and several other plaintiffs in 2002 and alleged that OPIC and Ex-Im Bank, both independent government entities, provide monetary assistance to projects without assessing the CO2 emissions of these projects as mandated by NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act. In 2005, the district court held that the plaintiffs had the right to sue the two agencies to force compliance. Under the terms of the settlement, the Ex-Im Bank, which provides financing for exports from the U.S., and OPIC, which offers insurance and loan guarantees for projects in developing countries, will revise their policies regarding the environment in consultation with representatives of the plaintiffs.  Additionally, the bank will be required, whenever possible, to post environmental documents online for public comment and will, in conjunction with representatives of the plaintiffs, “develop and implement a carbon policy.”  Further, the settlement requires the bank to assume a “leadership role” by taking actions such as encouraging transparency with regard to GHG emissions and “proposing common greenhouse gas mitigation standards for financed projects.” The settlement with OPIC requires that any project that emits more than 100,000 tons of CO2 equivalent a year be subject to an environmental impact assessment that takes into account GHG emissions. In addition, the settlement requires OPIC to report the emissions from such projects to the public on a yearly basis and to reduce the number of projects by 20% over the next 10 years.
Settlement Agreement
02/06/2009
Settlement Agreement
09/17/2007
Decision
03/30/2007
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied; defendants' motion for summary judgment granted in part and denied in part.
Decision