Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Glass, Lewis & Co. v. Paxton

Glass, Lewis & Co. v. Paxton 

1:25-cv-01153United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (W.D. Tex.)6 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
12/18/2025
Defendants' opposed motion to consolidate cases granted.
Decision
09/09/2025
First amended complaint filed.
Complaint
08/29/2025
Motion for preliminary injunction denied.
In lawsuits brought by two proxy advisor firms, the federal district court for the Western District of Texas granted preliminary relief enjoining Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton from enforcing S.B. 2337, a law that requires that a proxy advisor disclose to its clients and the subject company and publish statements on its website if its advice is “not provided solely in the financial interest of the shareholders of a company.” This requirement applies to advice that is “wholly or partly based on, or otherwise takes into account, one or more nonfinancial factors,” including, among other factors, environmental, social, or governance (ESG) goals, factors, or investment principles and “a social credit or sustainability factor or score.” The law was scheduled to take effect on September 1. In a text order issued after an August 29, 2025 hearing, the court found that the plaintiff firms had standing and satisfied the standard for a preliminary injunction.
Decision
07/28/2025
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
Motion

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. v. Paxton 

1:25-cv-01160United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (W.D. Tex.)10 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
08/29/2025
Motion for preliminary injunction granted.
In lawsuits brought by two proxy advisor firms, the federal district court for the Western District of Texas granted preliminary relief enjoining Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton from enforcing S.B. 2337, a law that requires that a proxy advisor disclose to its clients and the subject company and publish statements on its website if its advice is “not provided solely in the financial interest of the shareholders of a company.” This requirement applies to advice that is “wholly or partly based on, or otherwise takes into account, one or more nonfinancial factors,” including, among other factors, environmental, social, or governance (ESG) goals, factors, or investment principles and “a social credit or sustainability factor or score.” The law was scheduled to take effect on September 1. In a text order issued after an August 29, 2025 hearing, the court found that the plaintiff firms had standing and satisfied the standard for a preliminary injunction.
Decision
08/25/2025
Opposition filed by plaintiff to motion for leave to file amicus brief.
Opposition
08/24/2025
Objection filed by plaintiff to proposed intervenors' request for expedited briefing.
Objections
08/22/2025
Reply filed in support of motion for preliminary injunction.
Reply