Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Collection

Nantucket Residents Against Turbines v. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

ACK Residents Against Turbines v. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

1:21-cv-11390D. Mass.15 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
06/13/2023
Appeal
Notice of appeal filed by plaintiffs.
05/17/2023
Decision
Defendants' and Vineyard Wind's motions for summary judgment granted and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied.
The federal district court for the District of Massachusetts rejected claims that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and National Marine Fisheries Service violated the Endangered Species Act and NEPA in connection with their decisions authorizing an offshore wind energy project off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. The court agreed with the project developer that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate a concrete injury with respect to the project’s potential air emissions or contributions to greenhouse gases, characterizing as “generalized” the individual plaintiff’s concern regarding the project’s potential to increase greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to climate change. The court found that these concerns were insufficient to confer standing for the plaintiffs’ NEPA air quality and emissions claims. The court rejected the plaintiffs’ claims related to right whales on the merits.
12/02/2022
Reply
Reply filed by Vineyard Wind 1 LLC in support of motion for summary judgment.
11/23/2022
Reply
Reply filed by federal defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment.

Nantucket Residents Against Turbines v. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

24-337U.S.6 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
01/13/2025
Decision
Plaintiffs' petition for writ of certiorari denied.
12/20/2024
Reply
Reply filed in support of petition for writ of certiorari.
12/10/2024
Opposition
Brief filed by federal respondents in opposition to petition for writ of certiorari.
12/10/2024
Opposition
Brief filed by respondent Vineyard Wind 1, LLC in opposition to petition for writ of certiorari.

Nantucket Residents Against Turbines v. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

23-15011st Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/24/2024
Decision
Judgment for defendants affirmed.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM’s) approval of the construction of the Vineyard Wind offshore wind project. Nantucket residents argued on appeal that the biological opinion prepared in conjunction with the project violated the Endangered Species Act by concluding that the project likely would not jeopardize the endangered North Atlantic right whale. The residents also argued that BOEM violated NEPA by relying on the biological opinion. The First Circuit rejected the residents’ critiques of the biological opinion, including an argument that the opinion did not properly analyze the right whale’s current status and environmental baseline because it ignored a recent study “that highlighted the growing importance of southern New England waters for right whale survival” (because of rising global temperatures). The First Circuit found that the biological opinion “repeatedly acknowledged that right whales are increasingly present in southern New England waters.” The First Circuit treated as waived challenges to the environmental impact statement not related to the biological opinion. The residents’ challenges before the district court had included that analysis of the project’s impacts on greenhouse gas emissions was inadequate.