- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Resource Renewal Institute v. National Park Servic...
Collection
Resource Renewal Institute v. National Park Service
Resource Renewal Institute v. National Park Service ↗
4:22-cv-00145-MMCN.D. Cal., United States Federal Courts3 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
01/10/2025
Decision
Motion to Stay Litigation denied.
Court denied motion to stay litigation, instead choosing to close the case while still receiving status reports from parties in regard to implementation of settlement agreement.
01/10/2025
Decision
Order denying proposed intervenors agricultural workers' motion to intervene.
–
01/10/2022
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Three organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of California challenging the National Park Service’s adoption of a General Management Plan amendment that expanded lands open to beef and dairy ranching within Point Reyes National Seashore and Golden Gate National Recreation Area. The complaint asserted violations of the Point Reyes Act, the National Park Service’s Organic Act, NEPA, the Clean Water Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act. In support of the NEPA claim, the plaintiffs alleged that the EIS “provided little information about the expected impacts of climate change and largely ignored how ranching will exacerbate these effects,” including expected exacerbation of water quality and water quantity problems.
Resource Renewal Institute, et al. v. Agricultural Workers, et al. ↗
25-251United States Federal Courts, United States Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
01/14/2025
Appeal
Notice of Appeal filed.
–
Agricultural workers Doe 1-8 appeal lower court decision denying their motion to intervene. Appellants sought to participate in the settlement agreement, arguing they had a protectable interest in the subject matter.
