Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

ADPF 934 (Transfer of funds to PRODES Cerrado)

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
BrazilFederal Supreme Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems (Global)
Principal law
BrazilFederal Constitution of 1988BrazilNational System of Nature Conservation Units – SNUC (Federal Law No. 9.985 of 2000)BrazilUN Framework Convention on Climate Change - UNFCCC (enacted by Federal Decree 2652/1998)
At issue
Whether the lack of destination of funds to the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) is unconstitutional.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta

Summary

On January 8, 2022, the Rede Sustentabilidade (Rede) political party filed an Argument for Failure to Comply with a Fundamental Precept (ADPF), with a request for an injunction, against the conduct of the Federal Government embodied in the lack of transfer of funds to the National Institute for Space Research (INPE), which makes it impossible to monitor deforestation in the Cerrado (PRODES Cerrado). The party highlights the high percentage of deforestation in the Cerrado and the high number of fires monitored by INPE in 2021, which is occurring alongside the advance of the agricultural and livestock frontier in the biome. It highlights the importance of the Cerrado in terms of preserving biodiversity and social aspects, as indigenous populations, quilombolas, geraizeiras, ribeirinhas, babaçueiras and vazanteiras survive on the biome's resources. It also highlights its importance for water distribution in the country, as the Cerrado is responsible for the flow of important river basins. It also points out that the biome stores 13.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide and, if it continues to be destroyed, there will be greater greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, preventing the achievement of international climate targets set by Brazil in the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions. It claims that INPE's monitoring of the biome is essential for the country to provide information under these agreements. The plaintiff party argues that the federal government's conduct violates various constitutional rights and principles and the precautionary principle. As a precautionary measure, it requests that the Federal Government prove that sufficient funds have been allocated to the PRODES Cerrado project. On a final basis, it requests a judgment upholding the action, confirming the precautionary measure, and declaring the unconstitutionality of the Federal Government's act of making the monitoring of the Cerrado unfeasible, due to the lack of transfer of funds to INPE.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance