- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Montana
- /
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. James
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. James
Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2026
Status
First amended complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
2:26-cv-00002
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States → Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging federal authorizations for vegetation management treatments throughout the 905,000 acres in southwest Montana.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
02/17/2026
First amended complaint filed.
Alliance for the Wild Rockies and three other organizations filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Montana challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) authorizations for vegetation management treatments throughout the 905,000 acres in southwest Montana managed by BLM’s Dillon Field Office. The plaintiffs alleged that the BLM defendants deferred selection of specific activities as part of the project “in a way that undermines informed decision-making and meaningful public participation” in violation of NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act. Among the failures cited in the complaint was an alleged failure to disclose and analyze the reasonably foreseeable effects of climate change in the project area and how climate change would continue to affect the project area and the authorized activities’ effectiveness. The complaint also alleged that the BLM defendants failed to take a hard look at the project’s effects on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon storage, including effects associated with the project’s “widespread prescribed fires.” The plaintiffs also alleged that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had concluded that the project was not likely to jeopardize the threatened whitebark pine in violation of the Endangered Species Act.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit challenging federal authorizations for vegetation management treatments throughout the 905,000 acres in southwest Montana.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance