Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. James

Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2026
Status
First amended complaint filed.
Docket number
2:26-cv-00002
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)United StatesFederal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging federal authorizations for vegetation management treatments throughout the 905,000 acres in southwest Montana.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
02/17/2026
First amended complaint filed.
Alliance for the Wild Rockies and three other organizations filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Montana challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) authorizations for vegetation management treatments throughout the 905,000 acres in southwest Montana managed by BLM’s Dillon Field Office. The plaintiffs alleged that the BLM defendants deferred selection of specific activities as part of the project “in a way that undermines informed decision-making and meaningful public participation” in violation of NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act. Among the failures cited in the complaint was an alleged failure to disclose and analyze the reasonably foreseeable effects of climate change in the project area and how climate change would continue to affect the project area and the authorized activities’ effectiveness. The complaint also alleged that the BLM defendants failed to take a hard look at the project’s effects on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon storage, including effects associated with the project’s “widespread prescribed fires.” The plaintiffs also alleged that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had concluded that the project was not likely to jeopardize the threatened whitebark pine in violation of the Endangered Species Act.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit challenging federal authorizations for vegetation management treatments throughout the 905,000 acres in southwest Montana.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance