- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. v. EPA
Litigation
Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. v. EPA
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
08/30/2019
Decision
Petitions for review denied.
The D.C. Circuit rejected a set of challenges to Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program rules. First, the court upheld the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) denial of petitions to reconsider its 2010 “point of obligation” rule that imposed RFS compliance obligations on refiners and importers but not on blenders. Second, the court upheld EPA’s decision not to reassess categories of “obligated parties” when it issued the 2017 annual standards. Third, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s cellulosic biofuel projection for 2017 and the decision not to use the entirety of the discretionary cellulosic waiver to lower the 2017 requirements for advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel. Fourth, the court rejected a claim that the 2018 volume for biomass-based diesel was too low.
Summary
Challenge to EPA Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) rulemakings.