Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce v. Engine Manufacturers Association

About this case

Filing year
2024
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
3:24-cv-50504
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Air Act (US)Industry Lawsuits (US)State and Municipal Vehicle Standards (US)
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)United StatesSupremacy Clause
At issue
Lawsuit challenging an agreement between the California Air Resources Board and major manufacturers of heavy-duty vehicles and engines and trade group representing vehicle and engine manufacturers as preempted by Clean Air Act.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
12/16/2024
Complaint filed.
American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting that the Clean Air Act preempted an agreement between the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and major manufacturers of heavy-duty vehicles and engines and trade group representing vehicle and engine manufacturers. The plaintiff described itself as representing businesses, including fleet owners and operators, that “are vitally interested in the preservation of free markets, free innovation, and the continued economic viability of the internal-combustion engine in our transportation sector, along with the economic growth and opportunities it enables.” It alleged that the CARB agreement “purportedly allows truck manufacturers limited relief from California’s intrusive and unlawful regulations for heavy-duty vehicles” in return for the manufacturers’ agreement to phase out sales of internal-combustion vehicles “regardless of what the law says or what their customers want.” The plaintiff mentioned a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/nebraska-v-daimler-truck-north-america/">lawsuit</a> filed by Nebraska and other states challenging the agreement on antitrust grounds but asserted that regardless of whether the agreement violated state or federal antitrust law, it was prohibited by the Clean Air Act because California had not received preemption waivers for the heavy-duty vehicle standards and the agreement therefore was “an ‘attempt to enforce’ prohibited state standards.”
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit challenging an agreement between the California Air Resources Board and major manufacturers of heavy-duty vehicles and engines and trade group representing vehicle and engine manufacturers as preempted by Clean Air Act.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance