- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Anderson v. City and County of San Francisco
Anderson v. City and County of San Francisco
Geography
Year
2005
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2005
Status
Opinion issued reversing trial court's ruling for respondents.
Geography
Docket number
A129910
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to city bike plan, including on grounds that it did not analyze greenhouse gas impacts.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
01/14/2013
Opinion issued reversing trial court's ruling for respondents.
An individual challenged an environmental impact report (EIR) prepared in conjunction with an update of San Francisco’s bike plan on numerous grounds, including that the report failed to properly analyze the increased amounts of GHG emissions caused by several aspects of the plan, including allegedly degraded intersections that would increase car idling. This court affirmed the dismissal of this and other issues, holding that the lower court properly concluded that the EIR properly addressed these. However, the court did remand the case given that the EIR failed to make a finding of infeasibility with respect to certain mitigation measures.
Decision
Summary
Challenge to city bike plan, including on grounds that it did not analyze greenhouse gas impacts.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience