Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers v. Ryan

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Response filed by defendant-intervenor to motion for preliminary injunction.
Docket number
1:25-cv-02417
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District of Colorado (D. Colo.)
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsFirst Amendment
Principal law
United StatesFirst Amendment
At issue
Trade association's challenge to a Colorado law requiring dissemination of certain information regarding health impacts of gas stoves.

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Summary
Document
10/06/2025
Response
Response filed by defendant-intervenor to motion for preliminary injunction.
10/01/2025
Reply
Reply filed in support of motion to dismiss CDPHE defendants.
09/30/2025
Opposition
Opposition filed by defendants to motion for preliminary injunction.
09/24/2025
Motion To Intervene
Unopposed motion to intervene filed by Physicians for Social Responsibility Colorado.
09/17/2025
Opposition
Opposition filed by plaintiff to motion to dismiss CDPHE defendants.
08/27/2025
Answer
Answer filed by Colorado Attorney General.
08/27/2025
Motion To Dismiss
Motion filed to dismiss CDPHE defendants.
08/19/2025
Motion
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
08/13/2025
Stipulation
Joint motion filed to set briefing schedule and hearing, and also stipulation filed to temporarily stay enforcement.
On August 13, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation in which the Colorado Attorney General agreed not to initiate enforcement actions under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act for alleged violations of the labeling law until at least 14 days after the court issues a ruling on the plaintiff’s forthcoming renewed motion for a preliminary injunction.
08/06/2025
Complaint
Complaint filed.
On August 6, 2025, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers—a trade association with members that manufacture gas and electric cooking products and other appliances—filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Colorado challenging a Colorado law requiring dissemination of what the plaintiff alleged was “a non-consensus, scientifically controversial, and factually misleading government-mandated message about the purported ‘health impacts’ of gas stoves that is contrary to the view of the World Health Organization, the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and federal agencies responsible for ensuring the health and safety of American consumers.” The plaintiff alleged that the law’s disclosure requirements violate the First Amendment because they are content- and viewpoint-based. The plaintiff also alleged that the law violated its members’ First Amendment rights because the legislative record showed that the legislation was not driven by purported health impacts “but instead by the unrelated policy debate on climate change and decarbonization.”

Summary

Trade association's challenge to a Colorado law requiring dissemination of certain information regarding health impacts of gas stoves.