Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers v. Ryan

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Response filed by defendant-intervenor to motion for preliminary injunction.
Docket number
1:25-cv-02417
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District of Colorado (D. Colo.)
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsFirst Amendment
Principal law
United StatesFirst Amendment
At issue
Trade association's challenge to a Colorado law requiring dissemination of certain information regarding health impacts of gas stoves.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
10/06/2025
Response filed by defendant-intervenor to motion for preliminary injunction.
Response
10/01/2025
Reply filed in support of motion to dismiss CDPHE defendants.
Reply
09/30/2025
Opposition filed by defendants to motion for preliminary injunction.
Opposition
09/24/2025
Unopposed motion to intervene filed by Physicians for Social Responsibility Colorado.
Motion To Intervene
09/17/2025
Opposition filed by plaintiff to motion to dismiss CDPHE defendants.
Opposition
08/19/2025
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
Motion
08/13/2025
Joint motion filed to set briefing schedule and hearing, and also stipulation filed to temporarily stay enforcement.
On August 13, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation in which the Colorado Attorney General agreed not to initiate enforcement actions under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act for alleged violations of the labeling law until at least 14 days after the court issues a ruling on the plaintiff’s forthcoming renewed motion for a preliminary injunction.
Stipulation
08/06/2025
Complaint filed.
On August 6, 2025, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers—a trade association with members that manufacture gas and electric cooking products and other appliances—filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Colorado challenging a Colorado law requiring dissemination of what the plaintiff alleged was “a non-consensus, scientifically controversial, and factually misleading government-mandated message about the purported ‘health impacts’ of gas stoves that is contrary to the view of the World Health Organization, the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and federal agencies responsible for ensuring the health and safety of American consumers.” The plaintiff alleged that the law’s disclosure requirements violate the First Amendment because they are content- and viewpoint-based. The plaintiff also alleged that the law violated its members’ First Amendment rights because the legislative record showed that the legislation was not driven by purported health impacts “but instead by the unrelated policy debate on climate change and decarbonization.”
Complaint

Summary

Trade association's challenge to a Colorado law requiring dissemination of certain information regarding health impacts of gas stoves.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector