- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Colorado
- /
- Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers v. Ryan
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers v. Ryan
Geography
Date
2025
Document type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Response filed by defendant-intervenor to motion for preliminary injunction.
Geography
Docket number
1:25-cv-02417
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District of Colorado (D. Colo.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims → First Amendment
Principal law
United States → First Amendment
At issue
Trade association's challenge to a Colorado law requiring dissemination of certain information regarding health impacts of gas stoves.
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Summary
Document
09/24/2025
Motion To Intervene
Unopposed motion to intervene filed by Physicians for Social Responsibility Colorado.
–
08/13/2025
Stipulation
Joint motion filed to set briefing schedule and hearing, and also stipulation filed to temporarily stay enforcement.
On August 13, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation in which the Colorado Attorney General agreed not to initiate enforcement actions under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act for alleged violations of the labeling law until at least 14 days after the court issues a ruling on the plaintiff’s forthcoming renewed motion for a preliminary injunction.
08/06/2025
Complaint
Complaint filed.
On August 6, 2025, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers—a trade association with members that manufacture gas and electric cooking products and other appliances—filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Colorado challenging a Colorado law requiring dissemination of what the plaintiff alleged was “a non-consensus, scientifically controversial, and factually misleading government-mandated message about the purported ‘health impacts’ of gas stoves that is contrary to the view of the World Health Organization, the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and federal agencies responsible for ensuring the health and safety of American consumers.” The plaintiff alleged that the law’s disclosure requirements violate the First Amendment because they are content- and viewpoint-based. The plaintiff also alleged that the law violated its members’ First Amendment rights because the legislative record showed that the legislation was not driven by purported health impacts “but instead by the unrelated policy debate on climate change and decarbonization.”
Summary
Trade association's challenge to a Colorado law requiring dissemination of certain information regarding health impacts of gas stoves.