- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- California Native Plant Society v. County of Los Angeles
California Native Plant Society v. County of Los Angeles
Geography
Year
2012
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2012
Status
Opinion issued directing trial court to issue writ of mandate.
Geography
Docket number
B258090
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to environmental review and approvals for large development.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
12/01/2016
Opinion issued directing trial court to issue writ of mandate.
In an unpublished decision addressing a greenhouse gas analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act that paralleled the analysis addressed by the California Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife, the California Court of Appeal found, as the Supreme Court had found, that the finding that the project at issue would not have significant greenhouse gas impacts was not supported by substantial evidence and reasoned discussion. This decision came after the California Supreme Court transferred the petitioners' appeal back to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife.
Decision
09/29/2015
Opinion issued.
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of claims in connection with environmental approvals for a section of Newhall Ranch known as Mission Village. As in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife and Friends of the Santa Clara River v. County of Los Angeles, the court was not persuaded by claims that it was legally impermissible for the environmental review to compare the project’s emissions with emissions under a business-as-usual scenario. The petitioners indicated that they would ask the California Supreme Court to hear this case.
Decision
Summary
Challenge to environmental review and approvals for large development.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance