- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. California Department of Water Resources
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. California Department of Water Resources
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Verified petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief filed.
Geography
Docket number
24WM000181
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Reverse Impact Assessment (US)Public Trust Claims (US)State Law Claims (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Endangered Species ActUnited States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)United States → Public Trust Doctrine
At issue
Challenge to approval of a plan for the long-term operation of the California State Water Project.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
11/26/2024
Verified petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief filed.
In two cases filed in California Superior Court challenging approval of a plan for the long-term operation of the California State Water Project, the petitioners raised climate change-related claims. The project allows an increase in the amount of water exported from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. One set of petitioners, led by the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, asserted causes of action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the 2009 Delta Reform Act, the California Endangered Species Act, and the public trust doctrine. The CEQA cause of action included allegations that the environmental review failed to disclose the project’s potential impacts during foreseeable sea level rise. The petition alleged that this failure “obscures an enormous potential impact: that the intakes for the State Water Project’s Delta diversions might be rendered useless due to inundation by saline waters as rising sea levels push upstream.” In the <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/san-francisco-baykeeper-v-california-department-of-water-resources/">proceeding filed by San Francisco Baykeeper</a>, other environmental groups, and the Winnemem Wintu Tribe, the petition asserted claims under the Delta Reform Act, CEQA, and the public trust doctrine. The CEQA allegations included that the Department of Water Resources had failed to provide “a realistic analysis … of how bad the Project, coupled with climate change-caused droughts, reduced streamflow, and increased sea level rise, will be for the Delta environment including imperiled fish species.” In addition, the petition alleged that the environmental impact report did not adequately discuss and analyze “California’s over-appropriated water rights system” or “the implications of impending climate change on future water deliveries for the Project.” The petitioners contended more generally that the CEQA review did not adequately address the Project’s foreseeable cumulative impacts on the San Francisco Bay-Delta watershed “in light of future climate change, particularly with regards to water supplies in the context of sea level rise, changes in storm patterns, and watershed run-off.”
Petition
Summary
Challenge to approval of a plan for the long-term operation of the California State Water Project.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance