Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

California Trucking Association v. California Air Resources Board

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Court so-ordered stipulation and order to hold case in abeyance pending outcome of rulemaking.
Docket number
2:23-cv-02333
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of California (E.D. Cal.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US)Commerce Clause (US)Constitutional Claims (US)Fourteenth Amendment (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Air Act (US)Industry Lawsuits (US)State and Municipal Vehicle Standards (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)United StatesCommerce ClauseUnited StatesFederal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994United StatesFourteenth Amendment—Due Process
At issue
Challenge to the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Fleets regulation, which set zero emission vehicle requirements.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/25/2025
Court so-ordered stipulation and order to hold case in abeyance pending outcome of rulemaking.
After the California Air Resources Board's January 13, 2025 withdrawal of its request for a Clean Air Act preemption waiver for parts of it Advanced Clean Fleets regulation, the parties to a challenge to the regulation agreed to hold the case in abeyance while CARB staff present a proposal to repeal the High-Priority Fleet and Drayage Fleet Requirements of the regulation. CARB also agreed not to enforce the requirement for 100% zero-emission-vehicle sales in the medium- and heavy-duty categories beginning with model year 2036 until CARB obtains a Clean Air Act preemption waiver.
Stipulation
10/16/2023
Complaint filed.
California Trucking Association (CTA) filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Eastern District of California challenging the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) regulation. The complaint characterized the ACF regulation as comprising four principal parts: (1) regulations to phase in zero emissions vehicles (ZEVs) for state and local government fleets; (2) regulations to phase in ZEVs for “high priority fleets”; (3) regulations to phase in ZEVs for drayage fleets; and (4) regulations to implement a 100% ZEV sales mandate effective in 2036. CTA asserted that the Clean Air Act and Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 preempted the ACF regulation, that it violated the dormant Commerce Clause, and that it violated the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution due to its vague standards and the discretion granted to CARB’s executive officer to determine whether to grant exemptions.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Fleets regulation, which set zero emission vehicle requirements.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance