- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Casa Mira Homeowners Association v. California Coa...
Litigation
Casa Mira Homeowners Association v. California Coastal Commission
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
12/30/2024
Decision
Judgment granting the petition for writ of mandate reversed as to its interpretation of “existing structures” and affirmed as to the trial court’s determination that
there is no substantial evidence supporting the Commission’s finding that armoring was unnecessary to protect the Coastal Trail.
The California Court of Appeal agreed with the California Coastal Commission that condominiums and a sewer line built in Half Moon Bay in 1984 were not entitled to shoreline armoring under the California Coastal Act. The appellate held that the phrase “existing structures” in the provision that specifies circumstances in which seawalls or other armoring infrastructure are permitted referred to structures that existed prior to the Coastal Act’s effective date of January 1, 1977. The court said “[t]his interpretation effectuates the Coastal Act’s goal to “[a]nticipate, assess, plan for, and, to the extent feasible, avoid, minimize, and mitigate the
adverse environmental and economic effects of sea level rise within the coastal zone.” The court therefore reversed the portion of a trial court’s decision that vacated the Commission’s denial of a request to build a seawall to protect the condominium and sewer line. The appellate court affirmed, however, the portion of the trial court’s decision that found that no substantial evidence supported the Commission’s conclusion that shoreline armoring was not necessary to protect a segment of the California Coastal Trail.
Summary
Challenge to the California Coastal Commission's approval of only a portion of a seawall intended to protect the California Coastal Trail, a sewer line, 10 townhomes, and three apartments.