- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. California Geologic Energy Management Division
Center for Biological Diversity v. California Geologic Energy Management Division
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Court so-ordered stipulation to dismiss with prejudice.
Geography
Docket number
22CV023134
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to the approval of 17 oil and gas wells in Los Angeles and Kern Counties.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
07/14/2023
Court so-ordered stipulation to dismiss with prejudice.
A California Superior Court so-ordered a stipulation dismissing with prejudice a lawsuit alleging that the California Department of Conservation Geologic Energy Management Division violated CEQA when it approved 17 oil and gas wells in Los Angeles and Kern Counties. The petitioner had alleged that the agency relied on environmental reviews conducted in the 1990s that failed to account for new information about the impacts of oil drilling. The stipulated request for dismissal said the petition had been rendered moot by the rescission or cancellation of the approvals for the wells. The CEQA determinations for the wells also had been voided.
Stipulation
–
12/01/2022
Verified petition for writ of mandate filed.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a lawsuit challenging the California Department of Conservation Geologic Energy Management Division’s (CalGEM’s) approval of 17 oil and gas wells in Los Angeles and Kern Counties. CBD contended that CalGEM violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by approving the well permits without adequate environmental review. The petition alleged that CalGEM relied on “antiquated, inapplicable, and inadequate environmental reviews of other agencies” that were conducted in the 1990s. The petition alleged that the CEQA documents were inadequate, including because they did not consider or disclose new information that had emerged since they were prepared about oil drilling’s significant impacts. The petition alleged that the CEQA documents did not mention greenhouse gases.
Petition
–
Summary
Challenge to the approval of 17 oil and gas wells in Los Angeles and Kern Counties.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance