- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Diego
Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Diego
Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Settlement reached.
Geography
Docket number
37-2020-00046553
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to the environmental review for the Otay Ranch Resort Village 13 project in San Diego County, California.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/25/2025
Settlement reached.
On March 25, 2025, California Attorney General Rob Bonta <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-otay-ranch-village-13-project-settlement-will-reduce">announced</a> a settlement that resolved the Attorney General’s and environmental organizations’ challenges to San Diego County’s approvals for the Otay Ranch Village 13 project. The settlement terms included enhanced mitigation for the project’s impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, wildfire risk and evacuation impacts, and biological resources impacts. The project will have a reduced footprint that will result in 292 acres of additional open space and an option for the developer to apply for development of 812 additional dwelling units within the reduced footprint. The additional greenhouse gas mitigation measures included full electrification of all buildings; installation of battery energy storage systems, solar photovoltaic systems, and electric vehicle charging outlets and stations; a prohibition on the use of gas-powered landscape maintenance equipment; and energy efficiency specifications. In addition, the settlement provided that the developer would fund a $15 million mitigation fund for projects to provide additional mitigation of greenhouse gases. The settlement also provided for the developer to fund enhancements to wildfire surveillance and to implement fire suppression and wildfire evacuation measures, as well as fire avoidance provisions in homeowner’s association documents and access to an online educational program about wildfire ignition prevention.
Settlement Agreement
03/17/2021
Motion for leave to intervene filed by People of the State of California ex rel. Xavier Becerra.
In March 2021, the California Attorney General filed a motion to intervene on behalf of the People of the State of California in a lawsuit challenging a residential development in San Diego County that the Attorney General argued would result in adverse environmental effects that could affect the public generally. The attorney general's petition included allegations regarding wildfire risk and the analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
Motion To Intervene
Summary
Challenge to the environmental review for the Otay Ranch Resort Village 13 project in San Diego County, California.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance