- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Hawaii
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Order granting joint motion to lift stay and adopt stipulated settlement agreement.
Geography
Docket number
1:22-cv-00373
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Lawsuit to compel designation of critical habitat for 49 species listed under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
05/11/2023
Order granting joint motion to lift stay and adopt stipulated settlement agreement.
Decision
05/11/2023
Stipulated settlement agreement filed.
The parties agreed that U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would submit critical habitat determinations for the 49 listed endangered species by 2027 for three species and 2028 for the remaining species.
Stipulation
08/11/2022
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity filed lawsuit in federal court in Hawai‘i to compel the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to designate critical habitat for 49 species listed under the Endangered Species Act in 2016. The species include 39 plant species and 10 animal species. The plaintiff alleged that the failure to designate critical habitat was made “more egregious” because the FWS had already recognized that the species’ already restricted habitats were threatened by urbanization, nonnative feral ungulates and plants, wildlife, and water extraction. The plaintiff further alleged that “habitat loss and degradation are expected to be exacerbated by climate change through sea level rise and coastal inundation,” leaving these “highly endemic species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of their range.”
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit to compel designation of critical habitat for 49 species listed under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Just transition
Economic sector
Finance