- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Florida
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Nesvik
Center for Biological Diversity v. Nesvik
Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2026
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
2:26-cv-01072
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Water Act (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Environmental organizations' challenge to biological opinion and Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for mixed-use residential and commercial development in Collier County, Florida.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
04/08/2026
Complaint filed.
Three environmental organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Middle District of Florida against federal defendants. The plaintiffs challenged a 2025 biological opinion and a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit issued in reliance on the biological opinion for a mixed-use residential and commercial development consisting of approximately 10,264.63 acres in Collier County, Florida (Project). The plaintiffs alleged that the project would destroy 5,000 acres of habitat for the endangered Florida panther. They contended that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (FWS’s) determination that the project would not jeopardize the continued existence of the panther failed to acknowledge was the panther “almost certainly faces jeopardy even without the Project” and also “failed meaningfully to analyze the additive impacts of the action to the panther’s survival and recovery prospects in that context.” Among other things, the complaint alleged that the FWS acknowledged that cumulative effects of climate change such as sea level rise and severe storms could further reduce suitable panther habitat but that the FWS failed to mention climate change in its jeopardy analysis. The plaintiffs asked the court to declare that the federal defendants violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Administrative Procedure Act, to set aside the biological opinion and Section 404 permit and remand the biological opinion for reinitiation of consultation under the ESA, and to enjoin the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from approving or taking any action pursuant to a Section 404 permit.
Complaint
Summary
Environmental organizations' challenge to biological opinion and Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for mixed-use residential and commercial development in Collier County, Florida.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Economic sector
Finance