Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. Nesvik

Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2026
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
2:26-cv-01072
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Water Act (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesClean Water Act (CWA)United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Environmental organizations' challenge to biological opinion and Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for mixed-use residential and commercial development in Collier County, Florida.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/08/2026
Complaint filed.
Three environmental organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Middle District of Florida against federal defendants. The plaintiffs challenged a 2025 biological opinion and a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit issued in reliance on the biological opinion for a mixed-use residential and commercial development consisting of approximately 10,264.63 acres in Collier County, Florida (Project). The plaintiffs alleged that the project would destroy 5,000 acres of habitat for the endangered Florida panther. They contended that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (FWS’s) determination that the project would not jeopardize the continued existence of the panther failed to acknowledge was the panther “almost certainly faces jeopardy even without the Project” and also “failed meaningfully to analyze the additive impacts of the action to the panther’s survival and recovery prospects in that context.” Among other things, the complaint alleged that the FWS acknowledged that cumulative effects of climate change such as sea level rise and severe storms could further reduce suitable panther habitat but that the FWS failed to mention climate change in its jeopardy analysis. The plaintiffs asked the court to declare that the federal defendants violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Administrative Procedure Act, to set aside the biological opinion and Section 404 permit and remand the biological opinion for reinitiation of consultation under the ESA, and to enjoin the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from approving or taking any action pursuant to a Section 404 permit.
Complaint

Summary

Environmental organizations' challenge to biological opinion and Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for mixed-use residential and commercial development in Collier County, Florida.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Economic sector
Finance