- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:25-cv-00140
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (E.D. Cal.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)United States → Mineral Leasing Act (MLA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s approval of 25 permits for drilling new oil and gas wells on public lands in the San Joaquin Valley.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
02/04/2025
Complaint filed.
In a lawsuit filed in the federal district court for the Eastern District of California, Center for Biological Diversity and four other organizations challenged the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) approval of 25 permits for drilling new oil and gas wells on public lands in the San Joaquin Valley. The plaintiffs alleged that BLM approved the permits in December 2024 and January 2025 “without waiting for this court to resolve the <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/center-for-biological-diversity-v-us-bureau-of-land-management-6/">current ongoing challenge</a> to BLM’s flawed review of drilling permits” and without analyzing the cumulative pollution impacts of the wells it was permitting. They alleged that “BLM’s repeated, piecemeal permit approvals without due regard for cumulative impacts represent a death by a thousand cuts that federal law is meant to prevent.” The complaint asserted that BLM violated the Clean Air Act, the public participation and substantive requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (including by failing to take a hard look at the drilling permits’ direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on greenhouse gas emissions), the Mineral Leasing Act, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s approval of 25 permits for drilling new oil and gas wells on public lands in the San Joaquin Valley.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance