- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of Interior
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of Interior
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:17-cv-0974
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Freedom of Information Act (US) → Lawsuits Brought by Plaintiffs Aligned with Environmentalist Interests (US)
Principal law
United States → Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
At issue
Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to compel disclosure of directives and communications regarding removal of climate change-related words from formal agency communications.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
05/23/2017
Complaint filed.
The Center for Biological Diversity filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of the Interior, EPA, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of State in the federal district court for the District of Columbia seeking to compel the agencies to provide records of any directives or communications barring or removing climate change-related words or phrases from formal communications. The Center for Biological Diversity also sought production of information, including webpages, that had allegedly been removed at the direction of the Trump administration. The Center submitted its FOIA requests in late March and early April 2017.
Complaint
Summary
Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to compel disclosure of directives and communications regarding removal of climate change-related words from formal agency communications.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Finance