- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Parties filed joint motion to enter settlement agreement.
Geography
Docket number
1:24-cv-00691
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to the decision not to list the Arkansas mudalia, a freshwater snail, under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
11/14/2024
Parties filed joint motion to enter settlement agreement.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) reached a settlement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to which FWS agreed to review the status of the Arkansas mudalia (a freshwater snail) by July 19, 2024 and make a finding as to whether listing the species as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act is not warranted, warranted, or warranted but precluded by other pending proposals. The defendants agreed to pay CBD $30,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The settlement resolved a lawsuit challenging FWS’s April 2019 conclusion that listing was not warranted. CBD alleged that FWS had not rationally addressed factors expected to negatively impact the snail’s future viability, including climate change-driven drought and storms.
Settlement Agreement
03/11/2024
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a lawsuit in federal district court in the District of Columbia challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision not to list the Arkansas mudalia, a freshwater snail, under the Endangered Species Act. The complaint alleged that the Arkansas mudalia “has been extirpated from 90% of its historic range and remaining populations face a myriad of ongoing and worsening threats to their survival, including climate change-driven impacts to its habitat suitability.” CBD asserted that the FWS did not rationally address factors expected to negatively impact the species’ future viability, including climate change-driven drought and storms. CBD alleged that the listing decision was based on “unsupported conclusions,” including an alleged finding that “climate change is unlikely to affect future viability of the Arkansas mudalia because its habitat is medium-to-large rivers.”
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to the decision not to list the Arkansas mudalia, a freshwater snail, under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance