- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Arizona
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Joint motion to enter settlement agreement filed.
Geography
Docket number
4:24-cv-00534
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Lawsuit to compel 12-month findings on petitions to list the Clover’s cactus and the Rio Grande shiner under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
01/10/2025
Joint motion to enter settlement agreement granted.
During the final weeks of the Biden administration, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) reached agreements that set schedules for review of the status of species to determine whether listing them as endangered or threatened is warranted. The plaintiffs in these cases identified climate change as one of the threats facing these species. FWS agreed to review the status of the Rio Grande shiner and make a 12-month finding as to whether listing is warranted by September 16, 2026, and to review the status and making a 12-month finding regarding the Clover’s cactus by September 9, 2027.
Decision
01/10/2025
Joint motion to enter settlement agreement filed.
Motion
10/31/2024
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and WildEarth Guardians filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Arizona challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s alleged failure to issue timely 12-month findings on petitions to list the Clover’s cactus and the Rio Grande shiner under the Endangered Species Act. The petitions were filed in 2020. The complaint alleged that the Clover’s cactus (a flowering succulent found only in three counties in New Mexico) was threatened by oil and gas exploration and development and also by the effects of climate change and illegal cactus collecting. The complaint alleged that the Rio Grande shiner (a small freshwater fish endemic to the Rio Grande basin) faced threats from the decline of the health of the Rio Grande and Pecos River systems, as well as from drought, which was increasing due to climate change.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit to compel 12-month findings on petitions to list the Clover’s cactus and the Rio Grande shiner under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance