- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Illinois
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Williams
Center for Biological Diversity v. Williams
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:22-cv-02989
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny their 2010 petition to list the Kirtland’s snake under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
09/08/2022
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed.
The federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois affirmed a voluntary stipulation to dismiss the case due to a venue dispute between the parties. The parties agreed that the plaintiffs would file a new suit in the federal district court of the District of Columbia to continue this matter.
Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal
06/08/2022
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and Hoosier Environmental Council filed a lawsuit challenging the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny their 2010 petition to list the Kirtland’s snake under the Endangered Species Act. They alleged that the snake’s population had declined due to urban and residential development, as well as agricultural development and associated harms, and that climate change also posed “a substantial threat” to the snake “as large portions of the species’ current range are predicted to become increasingly unsuited to meet the species’ ecological needs.” Their complaint alleged that best available science indicated that climate change would make most of the snake’s current range unsuitable in the foreseeable future, and that the FWS arbitrarily assumed that the snake would adapt to and survive climate change in its current range. In addition, the complaint alleged that the FWS did not adequately evaluate whether threats from climate change and other factors constituted “concentrated” threats.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny their 2010 petition to list the Kirtland’s snake under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance