Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. Williams

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed.
Docket number
1:22-cv-02989
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny their 2010 petition to list the Kirtland’s snake under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
09/08/2022
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed.
The federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois affirmed a voluntary stipulation to dismiss the case due to a venue dispute between the parties. The parties agreed that the plaintiffs would file a new suit in the federal district court of the District of Columbia to continue this matter.
Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal
06/08/2022
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and Hoosier Environmental Council filed a lawsuit challenging the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny their 2010 petition to list the Kirtland’s snake under the Endangered Species Act. They alleged that the snake’s population had declined due to urban and residential development, as well as agricultural development and associated harms, and that climate change also posed “a substantial threat” to the snake “as large portions of the species’ current range are predicted to become increasingly unsuited to meet the species’ ecological needs.” Their complaint alleged that best available science indicated that climate change would make most of the snake’s current range unsuitable in the foreseeable future, and that the FWS arbitrarily assumed that the snake would adapt to and survive climate change in its current range. In addition, the complaint alleged that the FWS did not adequately evaluate whether threats from climate change and other factors constituted “concentrated” threats.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny their 2010 petition to list the Kirtland’s snake under the Endangered Species Act.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Risk
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance