Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Citizens Caring for the Future v. Haaland

Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Petition for review of agency action filed.
Docket number
2:23-cv-60
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsD.N.M.
Case category
Federal Statutory ClaimsNEPA
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to the authorization of 32 oil and gas leases covering public lands in New Mexico.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
01/23/2023
Petition for review of agency action filed.
Four nonprofit organizations filed a lawsuit in federal district court in New Mexico challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) authorization of 32 oil and gas leases covering more than 5,900 acres of land in New Mexico administered by BLM’s Carlsbad Field Office. The petitioners alleged that the Biden administration “rubber-stamped” the Trump administration’s decision to hold the January 2021 lease sale and that BLM failed to comply with NEPA, including by failing to take a hard look at cumulative impacts of greenhouse gas emissions and climate impacts when added to other greenhouse gas-emitting activities. The petitioners also asserted that BLM failed to evaluate the significance and severity of the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and climate impacts and arbitrarily and capriciously decided not to use the social cost of carbon or carbon budgeting as tools to assess significance. The petition alleged that BLM could not simply quantify emissions that would result from the challenged action but must “actually analyze their significance in the context of the global climate crisis,” including by considering past, present, and reasonably foreseeable greenhouse gas emissions that would occur as a result of BLM’s fossil fuel program, not just the January 2021 lease sale and not just lease sales within BLM’s New Mexico State Office jurisdiction. The complaint also alleged a failure to take a hard look at impacts on air pollution, public health, and water resources. With respect to water resources, the complaint alleged that climate change made it “even more important to protect potentially usable sources of groundwater.”
Petition

Summary

Challenge to the authorization of 32 oil and gas leases covering public lands in New Mexico.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience