- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States of America
- /
- City of Oakland v. BP p.l.c.
City of Oakland v. BP p.l.c.
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Remand to state court affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
22-16810, 22-16812
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)Common Law Claims (US)
Principal law
United States → State Law—NuisanceUnited States → Supremacy Clause
At issue
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
11/27/2023
Remand to state court affirmed.
In an unpublished memorandum, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the remand to state court of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s climate change cases against fossil fuel companies. Citing its 2022 decisions in County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp. and City & County of Honolulu v. Sunoco LP, the Ninth Circuit found that neither of the grounds for removal that the companies raised on appeal provided a basis for federal jurisdiction. First, the Ninth Circuit found that the companies’ actions during World War II and pursuant to ongoing specialized fuel contracts were actions taken pursuant to “arms-length business agreements,” and that the companies were not “acting under” federal officers, as would be required for removal under the federal officer removal statute. Second, the Ninth Circuit rejected the companies’ argument that the Grable exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule applied because the cities’ claims necessarily raised substantial and disputed First Amendment issues. The court noted that it was settled law that a case cannot be removed to federal court on the basis of a federal defense, even if the complaint anticipates the defense.
Decision
10/20/2023
Plaintiffs-appellees submitted notice of errata regarding answer brief.
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Notice
10/16/2023
Matter ordered submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument.
After initially setting a date of November 13 for oral argument in fossil fuel companies’ appeals seeking to reverse the remand to state court of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s climate change cases, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that “the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument.”
Decision
10/02/2023
Letter filed by plaintiffs-appellees regarding supplemental authorities (Second Circuit decision in Connecticut case).
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Letter
06/26/2023
Reply brief filed by appellants.
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Reply
05/18/2023
Letter filed by plaintiffs-appellees regarding supplemental authority (Supreme Court denial of certiorari in Hoboken/Delaware cases).
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Letter
05/12/2023
Brief filed by California and other states as amici curiae in support of plaintiffs-appellees.
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Amicus Motion/Brief
05/05/2023
Answering brief filed.
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Brief
04/28/2023
Unopposed motion to consolidate Nos. 22-16810 and 22-16812 granted.
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Decision
03/31/2023
Opening brief filed.
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Brief
Summary
Public nuisance actions brought by City of Oakland and City of San Francisco against fossil fuel companies.
Topics mentioned most in this case
See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance