- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. County of San Diego
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. County of San Diego
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Petition for writ of mandate filed.
Geography
Docket number
37-2017-00001635-CU-TT-CTL
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to the Forest Conservation Initiative Amendment to the San Diego County general plan.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
01/13/2017
Petition for writ of mandate filed.
Two local environmental organizations challenged San Diego County’s approval of a “Forest Conservation Initiative Amendment” to the County’s general plan. The Amendment applied to more than 70,000 acres of the Cleveland National Forest. The petitioners alleged that the Amendment would have “devastating, long-term consequences” for San Diego’s backcountry and would result in increased greenhouse gas emissions. They asserted that the County had failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including by improperly relying on guidance issued in July 2016 to conduct the analysis of greenhouse gas impacts instead of relying on thresholds set forth in a legally adequate Climate Action Plan (which the County had not adopted). They also asserted that the County’s analysis had relied on statewide per-person greenhouse gas goals necessary to achieve statewide goals, “without substantial evidence that they are relevant to projects in San Diego County” and that the environmental impact report (EIR) did not provide substantial evidence to support the emissions disclosed. In addition, the petitioners said that the County had failed to adopt feasible mitigation measures to address the Amendment’s significant greenhouse gas impacts. The petitioners further alleged that the Amendment violated the California Planning and Zoning Law because it was inconsistent with the County’s general plan, which required that evaluation of greenhouse gas impacts be based on a Climate Action Plan.
Petition
Summary
Challenge to the Forest Conservation Initiative Amendment to the San Diego County general plan.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance