- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Mississippi
- /
- Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Litigation
Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
03/20/2012
Decision
Memorandum opinion and order issued granting motions to dismiss.
A federal district court in Mississippi held that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel barred claims for trespass, nuisance, and negligence against oil, coal, electric, and chemical companies for damages stemming from Hurricane Katrina. The court held that the lawsuit was nearly identical to the individuals’ 2005 lawsuit. The court also found that the plaintiffs lacked standing because their claims were not fairly traceable to the companies’ conduct, that the lawsuit presented a non-justiciable political question, that all of the claims were preempted by the Clean Air Act, that the claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate that their injuries were proximately caused by the companies’ conduct.
05/27/2011
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Plaintiffs refiled their climate change tort action alleging public and private nuisance, trespass, and
negligence causes of action under Mississippi law.
Summary
Action seeking damages related to damages from Hurricane Katrina, refiled after 2010 dismissal by Fifth Circuit.