- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- County of Butte v. Department of Water Resources
County of Butte v. Department of Water Resources
Geography
Year
2008
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2008
Status
Court of Appeal's decision affirmed in part and reversed in part and case remanded for further proceedings.
Geography
Docket number
S258574
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Supreme Court (Cal.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Reverse Impact Assessment (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)United States → Federal Power ActUnited States → Supremacy Clause
At issue
Lawsuit alleging failure to consider the environmental effects of climate change on the operation of the Oroville Dam and related facilities.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
08/01/2022
Court of Appeal's decision affirmed in part and reversed in part and case remanded for further proceedings.
The California Supreme Court reversed in part a Court of Appeal’s decision holding that the Federal Power Act (FPA) preempted challenges to the Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) environmental review for renewal of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license to operate the Oroville Facilities, which included a hydroelectric dam. The petitioners, Butte and Plumas Counties, challenged the sufficiency of the environmental impact report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including for failing to adopt mitigation measures with respect to climate change. The Supreme Court concluded that the FPA would not preempt CEQA to the extent that the EIR informed decision-making about “matters outside FERC’s jurisdiction or compatible with FERC’s exclusive licensing authority,” such as DWR’s consideration of whether to request particular terms from FERC.
Decision
Summary
Lawsuit alleging failure to consider the environmental effects of climate change on the operation of the Oroville Dam and related facilities.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance