Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

County of Santa Cruz v. Chevron Corp.

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
07/18/2018
Appeal
Notice of appeal filed.
07/10/2018
Decision
Motions to remand granted.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California granted motions by the County of Santa Cruz, City of Santa Cruz, and City of Richmond to remand to state court their lawsuits seeking to hold fossil fuel companies liable for climate change harms. The court cited its previous remand order in cases brought by the County of San Mateo, County of Marin, and City of Imperial Beach. The court stayed the remand orders pending the outcome of appeals in those other cases. The defendants are appealing to the Ninth Circuit.
03/23/2018
Reply
Reply filed by plaintiffs in support of motion to remand in response to Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s additional notice of removal.
03/20/2018
Opposition
Opposition filed by Marathon Petroleum Corp. to plaintiffs' motion to remand in response to additional notice of removal.
03/16/2018
Reply
Reply filed by plaintiffs in support of motion to remand; motion to remand filed in response to Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s additional notice of removal.
03/02/2018
Opposition
Joint opposition to remand filed by defendants.
02/16/2018
Motion
Motion to remand to state court filed by plaintiffs.
01/19/2018
Notice
Notice of removal filed.
The defendants in the Santa Cruz lawsuits removed those cases to federal court on January 19, 2018. The defendants in the Santa Cruz cases asserted that the plaintiffs’ claims implicated “uniquely federal interests” and were governed by federal common law. The defedants also asserted that the claims “attack federal policy decisions and threaten to upset longstanding federal-state relations, second-guess policy decisions made by Congress and the Executive Branch, and skew divisions of responsibility set forth in federal statutes and the United States Constitution” and therefore necessarily raised substantial and disputed questions of federal law. In addition, the defendants contended that the Clean Air Act completely preempted the claims and that the federal court had jurisdiction pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the federal officer removal statute, the federal enclave doctrine, and the bankruptcy removal statute.

Summary

Lawsuits alleging that fossil fuel companies caused cities' and county's climate change-related injuries.