- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Dakota Rural Action v. U.S. Department of Agricult...
Litigation
Dakota Rural Action v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/04/2023
Decision
CAFO provisions of final rule vacated.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia vacated provisions of a Farm Service Agency (FSA) 2016 final rule that established a categorical exemption from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for loan actions to medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Medium-sized CAFOs stable or confine 200 to 699 mature dairy cows, 300 to 999 veal calves, 300 to 999 cattle, or 37,500 to 124,999 chickens. The court found that FSA had not provided notice that it would exempt all such loan actions from any NEPA review, had provided no opportunity for public comment on this change, and had provided “essentially no reasoning” for the change. The plaintiffs’ allegations included that CAFOs are one of the largest sources of air pollution in the U.S. and that “CAFOs and CAFO waste disposal also release the powerful greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide,” contributing to climate change.
11/07/2019
Reply
Defendants replied in support of their motion for remand without vacatur and opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
–
10/17/2019
Opposition
Plaintiffs filed opposition to motion for remand without vacatur and a cross-motion for summary judgment.
–
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) rule that categorically excluded FSA funding of medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations from NEPA review.