- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Montana
- /
- Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell
Litigation
Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/04/2016
Decision
Order issued.
The federal district court for the District of Montana vacated the withdrawal by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of a proposal to list the distinct population segment of the North American wolverine as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The court described at length the 20-year period over which the FWS considered whether to list the DPS. The process culminated in the withdrawal of the proposed listing 18 months after it was proposed. In withdrawing the proposal, the FWS reversed course on its previous determinations regarding climate change’s impacts on the wolverine and said it did not have sufficient information to suggest the wolverine population would be at risk of extinction due to climate change. The court agreed with the plaintiffs that the FWS unlawfully ignored the best available science by dismissing the threat to the wolverine posed by climate change and also by dismissing the threat to the wolverine posed by genetic isolation and small population size. The court remanded the matter to the FWS, stating: “It is the undersigned's view that if there is one thing required of the [FWS] under the ESA, it is to take action at the earliest possible, defensible point in time to protect against the loss of biodiversity within our reach as a nation. For the wolverine, that time is now.”
11/20/2015
Reply
Reply filed by state defendant-intervenors in support of combined cross-motion for summary judgment.
–
11/20/2015
Reply
Reply brief filed by defendant-intervenors' American Petroleum Institute et al. in support of cross-motion for summary judgment.
–
11/06/2015
Reply
Reply filed by federal defendants' in support of cross-motion for summary judgment.
–
10/16/2015
Response
Consolidated response to defendants' motion for summary judgment and reply in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs.
–
09/25/2015
Reply
Plaintiffs Defenders of Wildlife et al. filed response to federal defendants' motion for summary judgment and reply in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
–
09/25/2015
Reply
Plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians et al. filed response in opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment and reply in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
–
08/17/2015
Decision
Memorandum filed by defendant-intervenor states in support of defendants cross-motion for summary judgment and in response to conservation organizations' motion for summary judgment.
–
08/17/2015
Motion For Summary Judgment
Defendant-intervenors American Petroleum Institute et al. filed cross-motion for summary judgment and response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
–
08/12/2015
Motion For Summary Judgment
Brief filed in support of federal defendants' motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
–
06/04/2015
Motion For Summary Judgment
Memorandum of law filed in support of plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians et al.'s motion for summary judgment.
–
05/29/2015
Decision
Memorandum of points and authorities filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for summary judgment.
–
02/20/2015
Motion To Intervene
Memorandum brief filed in support of Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter's motion to intervene.
–
02/13/2015
Response
Consolidated response filed by plaintiffs to Idaho Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, and State of Montana motions to intervene.
–
02/03/2015
Motion To Intervene
Motion to intervene filed by American Petroleum Institute, Montana Petroleum Association, and Western Energy Alliance.
–
Summary
Challenge to withdrawal of proposal to list the distinct population segment of the North American wolverine as threatened.