Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell

Geography
Year
2014
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2014
Status
Order issued.
Docket number
14-246-M-DLC
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to withdrawal of proposal to list the distinct population segment of the North American wolverine as threatened.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/04/2016
Order issued.
The federal district court for the District of Montana vacated the withdrawal by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of a proposal to list the distinct population segment of the North American wolverine as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The court described at length the 20-year period over which the FWS considered whether to list the DPS. The process culminated in the withdrawal of the proposed listing 18 months after it was proposed. In withdrawing the proposal, the FWS reversed course on its previous determinations regarding climate change’s impacts on the wolverine and said it did not have sufficient information to suggest the wolverine population would be at risk of extinction due to climate change. The court agreed with the plaintiffs that the FWS unlawfully ignored the best available science by dismissing the threat to the wolverine posed by climate change and also by dismissing the threat to the wolverine posed by genetic isolation and small population size. The court remanded the matter to the FWS, stating: “It is the undersigned's view that if there is one thing required of the [FWS] under the ESA, it is to take action at the earliest possible, defensible point in time to protect against the loss of biodiversity within our reach as a nation. For the wolverine, that time is now.”
Decision
11/20/2015
Reply filed by state defendant-intervenors in support of combined cross-motion for summary judgment.
Reply
11/20/2015
Reply brief filed by defendant-intervenors' American Petroleum Institute et al. in support of cross-motion for summary judgment.
Reply
11/06/2015
Reply filed by federal defendants' in support of cross-motion for summary judgment.
Reply
10/16/2015
Consolidated response to defendants' motion for summary judgment and reply in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs.
Response
09/25/2015
Plaintiffs Defenders of Wildlife et al. filed response to federal defendants' motion for summary judgment and reply in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Reply
09/25/2015
Plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians et al. filed response in opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment and reply in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Reply
08/17/2015
Memorandum filed by defendant-intervenor states in support of defendants cross-motion for summary judgment and in response to conservation organizations' motion for summary judgment.
Decision
08/17/2015
Defendant-intervenors American Petroleum Institute et al. filed cross-motion for summary judgment and response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
08/12/2015
Brief filed in support of federal defendants' motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
06/04/2015
Memorandum of law filed in support of plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians et al.'s motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
05/29/2015
Memorandum of points and authorities filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for summary judgment.
Decision
02/20/2015
Memorandum brief filed in support of Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter's motion to intervene.
Motion To Intervene
02/13/2015
Consolidated response filed by plaintiffs to Idaho Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, and State of Montana motions to intervene.
Response
02/03/2015
Motion to intervene filed by American Petroleum Institute, Montana Petroleum Association, and Western Energy Alliance.
Motion To Intervene

Summary

Challenge to withdrawal of proposal to list the distinct population segment of the North American wolverine as threatened.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance