Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Motion for summary judgment granted to the extent that case is remanded to defendants.
Geography
Docket number
1:20-cv-00142
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (S.D. Miss.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Document with title of Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
11/22/2022
Motion for summary judgment granted to the extent that case is remanded to defendants.
Lawsuit alleging that consultation under the Endangered Species Act was required for the ongoing operations of the Bonnet Carré Spillway.
Decision
04/15/2020
Complaint filed.
Defenders of Wildlife and Healthy Gulf filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Mississippi claiming that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Mississippi River Commission were failing to comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in connection with its operation of the Bonnet Carré Spillway, a flood-control mechanism on the lower Mississippi River. The plaintiffs alleged that the agencies had never completed formal or informal consultation under the ESA to consider the impact of diversions on nine threatened and endangered species that inhabit the bodies of water into which the spillway diverts water to reduce flooding in New Orleans. The complaint states: “As more extreme storms and varied weather increase the number and intensity of floods in the lower Mississippi River valley region, it is likely that the Spillway will be opened more frequently and for increasingly longer duration in the future. This in turn will increase the frequency and duration that imperiled species and habitats are subjected to Spillway water pollutants and other impacts.”
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit alleging that consultation under the Endangered Species Act was required for the ongoing operations of the Bonnet Carré Spillway.

 Topics mentioned most in this case

See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance