- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Georgia
- /
- Durand v. Echols
Durand v. Echols
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Joint stipulation and consent motion to dismiss with prejudice filed.
Geography
Docket number
22CV04548
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → N.D. Ga.
Case category
Climate Change Protesters and Scientists → ProtestersConstitutional Claims → First Amendment
Principal law
United States → First Amendment
At issue
Lawsuit alleging that a Georgia Public Service Commissioner violated an individual's free speech rights by blocking her criticism of the Commissioner's positions on energy issues on Twitter and Facebook.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
10/13/2023
Joint stipulation and consent motion to dismiss with prejudice filed.
Parties agreed to dismiss the case regarding violations of free speech involving social media messages.
Stipulation
07/27/2023
Motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.
Court found that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on the individual capacity claims, finding that the claims against defendant in his official capacity were to proceed.
Decision
11/15/2022
Brief filed by plaintiff in support of preliminary injunction.
Motion
11/15/2022
Complaint filed.
In a lawsuit filed in the federal district court for the Northern District of Georgia, a plaintiff asserted that a Georgia Public Service Commissioner had violated her free speech rights by blocking her accounts on Twitter and Facebook. The plaintiff described herself as “a concerned citizen” who was “politically active” and who had run to serve on the Public Service Commission before the a federal court cancelled the election based on a Voting Rights Act violation. The plaintiff alleged that her constitutionally protected speech on the Commissioner’s Twitter account and Facebook page included “criticism of Commissioner Echols’ positions on the viability of nuclear energy sources and programs in Georgia, effective methods of tackling carbon dioxide reduction, and Georgia utility rate increases.” For example, the plaintiff alleged that she responded to the Commissioner’s re-tweet of an assertion that a carbon tax would be ineffective in reducing global carbon dioxide levels with criticism of the Commission’s investment in nuclear power. The plaintiff sought to enjoin the defendant from censoring her comments and to enjoin “the current unconstitutional and standard-less practice of deleting platform activity and blocking users …due to their content or viewpoint.” Other relief sought included damages and attorney’s fees.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit alleging that a Georgia Public Service Commissioner violated an individual's free speech rights by blocking her criticism of the Commissioner's positions on energy issues on Twitter and Facebook.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector