Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Durand v. Echols

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Joint stipulation and consent motion to dismiss with prejudice filed.
Docket number
22CV04548
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsN.D. Ga.
Case category
Climate Change Protesters and ScientistsProtestersConstitutional ClaimsFirst Amendment
Principal law
United StatesFirst Amendment
At issue
Lawsuit alleging that a Georgia Public Service Commissioner violated an individual's free speech rights by blocking her criticism of the Commissioner's positions on energy issues on Twitter and Facebook.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
10/13/2023
Joint stipulation and consent motion to dismiss with prejudice filed.
Parties agreed to dismiss the case regarding violations of free speech involving social media messages.
Stipulation
07/27/2023
Motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.
Court found that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on the individual capacity claims, finding that the claims against defendant in his official capacity were to proceed.
Decision
11/15/2022
Brief filed by plaintiff in support of preliminary injunction.
Motion
11/15/2022
Complaint filed.
In a lawsuit filed in the federal district court for the Northern District of Georgia, a plaintiff asserted that a Georgia Public Service Commissioner had violated her free speech rights by blocking her accounts on Twitter and Facebook. The plaintiff described herself as “a concerned citizen” who was “politically active” and who had run to serve on the Public Service Commission before the a federal court cancelled the election based on a Voting Rights Act violation. The plaintiff alleged that her constitutionally protected speech on the Commissioner’s Twitter account and Facebook page included “criticism of Commissioner Echols’ positions on the viability of nuclear energy sources and programs in Georgia, effective methods of tackling carbon dioxide reduction, and Georgia utility rate increases.” For example, the plaintiff alleged that she responded to the Commissioner’s re-tweet of an assertion that a carbon tax would be ineffective in reducing global carbon dioxide levels with criticism of the Commission’s investment in nuclear power. The plaintiff sought to enjoin the defendant from censoring her comments and to enjoin “the current unconstitutional and standard-less practice of deleting platform activity and blocking users …due to their content or viewpoint.” Other relief sought included damages and attorney’s fees.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit alleging that a Georgia Public Service Commissioner violated an individual's free speech rights by blocking her criticism of the Commissioner's positions on energy issues on Twitter and Facebook.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector