- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Massachusetts
- /
- Duxbury Energy Storage, LLC v. Town of Duxbury Zoning Board of Appeals
Duxbury Energy Storage, LLC v. Town of Duxbury Zoning Board of Appeals
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment allowed.
Geography
Docket number
23 MISC 000643 (LER)
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Massachusetts Land Court(Mass. Land Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Other Types of State Law Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → Massachusetts Dover AmendmentUnited States → Massachusetts Zoning Law
At issue
Challenge to zoning board's decision upholding the denial of a permit for a standalone battery energy storage facility on the grounds that the facility was not protected by the Massachusetts law limiting local restrictions on solar energy.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
06/23/2025
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment allowed.
The Massachusetts Land Court ruled that the Town of Duxbury Zoning Board of Appeals erred when it upheld the denial of a permit for a standalone battery energy storage facility on the grounds that the facility was not protected by the Massachusetts law (the Solar Energy Provision) limiting local governments’ ability to prohibit or restrict development of solar energy systems and related structures. The Solar Energy Provision bars local governments from prohibiting or unreasonably regulating “the installation of solar energy systems or the building of structures that facilitate the collection of solar energy, except where necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare.” The court concluded that the battery energy storage project involved “the building of structures that facilitate the collection of solar energy” and was therefore protected by the Solar Energy Provision. The court concluded that energy storage projects not only comport with the Solar Energy Provision’s plain language but are also consistent with legislative intent and effectuate the provision’s goals, which the Supreme Judicial Court had recognized “are naturally and directly tied to the Commonwealth’s current decarbonization and net-zero targets.” The Land Court wrote that energy storage projects “maximize and promote the utilization and generation of solar energy.” Because the Zoning Board of Appeals decision on the project was based on a legally untenable ground, the court annulled the decision.
Decision
Summary
Challenge to zoning board's decision upholding the denial of a permit for a standalone battery energy storage facility on the grounds that the facility was not protected by the Massachusetts law limiting local restrictions on solar energy.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance