- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- E&B Natural Resources Management Corp. v. County of Alameda
E&B Natural Resources Management Corp. v. County of Alameda
Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2018
Status
Third joint case management statement filed.
Geography
Docket number
4:18-cv-05857
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Fifth Amendment (US)Constitutional Claims (US) → Fourteenth Amendment (US)
Principal law
United States → Fifth Amendment—TakingsUnited States → Fourteenth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Fourteenth Amendment—Equal ProtectionUnited States → Inverse CondemnationUnited States → Vested Rights Doctrine
At issue
Lawsuit challenging Alameda County’s decision not to renew conditional use permits for continued operation of an oil extraction and production facility in the City of Livermore.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
07/20/2020
Third joint case management statement filed.
Statement
11/04/2019
Motion to intervene denied.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California denied Center for Biological Diversity’s (CBD’s) motion to intervene in a lawsuit challenging Alameda County’s decision not to renew conditional use permits for continued operation of an oil extraction and production facility in the City of Livermore. CBD argued that its “substantial involvement” in the matter—including its administrative appeal, which led to the County’s denial of the permits—gave it a significantly protectable interest in the litigation. In addition, CBD asserted a significantly protectable interest in “advancing its longstanding organizational mission to protect the environment and combat climate change.” Although the court agreed that CBD had a significantly protectable interest, the court found that CBD had not demonstrated that the County would not adequately represent CBD’s interests. The court also found that efficient resolution of the dispute outweighed the benefits of permissive intervention.
Decision
08/13/2019
Motion for leave to intervene filed by Center for Biological Diversity.
Motion To Intervene
09/24/2018
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit challenging Alameda County’s decision not to renew conditional use permits for continued operation of an oil extraction and production facility in the City of Livermore.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance