- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Earth Island Institute v. Coca-Cola Co.
Earth Island Institute v. Coca-Cola Co.
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Dismissal of complaint reversed.
Geography
Docket number
22-CV-0895
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → D.C.
Case category
State Law Claims → Environmentalist Lawsuits
Principal law
United States
At issue
Lawsuit alleging that Coca-Cola engaged in false and deceptive marketing by representing itself as a “sustainable and environmentally friendly company" despite being one of the world's largest contributors to plastic pollution.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
08/29/2024
Dismissal of complaint reversed.
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of a deceptive marketing lawsuit against Coca-Cola Company under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA). The plaintiff, Earth Island Institute, alleged that Coca-Cola misled consumers regarding its environmental sustainability with statements that touted the company’s efforts to address packaging waste when the company actually was failing to take necessary steps to meet its sustainability goals. Allegedly misleading statements included that the company was taking a “leadership position” on the “interconnected global challenges of packaging waste and climate change.” As a threshold matter, the court found that Earth Island Institute had standing to bring the CPPA claim. On the merits, the Court of Appeals found that the plaintiff stated a facially plausible misrepresentation and rejected arguments that “aspirational” statements could not be actionable under the CPPA. The Court of Appeals also found that Coca-Cola’s claims regarding plastic packaging were “very much statements about its ‘goods and services’” for purposes of the CPPA. The appellate court also held that misleading misrepresentations did not have to be in a single statement to be actionable under the CPPA. In addition, the court rejected Coca-Cola’s argument that the First Amendment precluded the lawsuit.
Decision
05/22/2023
Amicus curiae brief filed by National Association of Manufacturers in support of defendant-appellee and affirmance.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/21/2023
Brief filed by District of Columbia as amicus curiae in support of appellant.
Amicus Motion/Brief
Summary
Lawsuit alleging that Coca-Cola engaged in false and deceptive marketing by representing itself as a “sustainable and environmentally friendly company" despite being one of the world's largest contributors to plastic pollution.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience