- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Energy Policy Advocates v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Energy Policy Advocates v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
SEC's motion for summary judgment granted.
Geography
Docket number
23-cv-507
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Freedom of Information Act (US) → Lawsuits Brought by Plaintiffs Aligned with Industry Interests (US)
Principal law
United States → Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
At issue
Lawsuit to compel the SEC to disclose certain communications with outside parties that allegedly encouraged adoption of climate change regulations.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
10/17/2024
SEC's motion for summary judgment granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia upheld the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) determinations that certain information was exempt from disclosure in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking records related to the SEC’s conversations and correspondence with two outside parties in connection with its climate change disclosure rulemaking. The FOIA request sought communications between SEC Senior Counsel for Climate and ESG and a climate management and accounting platform company and a sustainability consultancy firm. The court found that the SEC showed that certain records were exempt under FOIA Exemption 4 for “trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person” that is “privileged or confidential.” The court also found that the SEC justified the withholding of other materials under Exemption 5 through the deliberative process privilege. The court concluded that the deliberations in the withheld materials were predecisional because they occurred before the SEC issued proposed rules in March and May 2022 and that it was clear that the withheld information was “part of the agency give-and-take by which the agency decisions regarding the proposed rules were made.” For both sets of withheld documents, the court found that the SEC sufficiently explained how disclosure would result in foreseeable harm.
Decision
Summary
Lawsuit to compel the SEC to disclose certain communications with outside parties that allegedly encouraged adoption of climate change regulations.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Fossil fuel
Economic sector