Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Fabiano Contarato, Randolph Rodrigues and Joenia Batista v. Ricardo Salles

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
BrazilFederal DistrictFederal District Federal Court
Case category
Suits against governmentsEnvironmental Crimes
Principal law
BrazilFederal Constitution of 1988BrazilNational Environmental Policy Act (Law No. 6.938 of 1981)BrazilParis Agreement (enacted by Federal Decree No. 9.073 of 2017)BrazilUN Framework Convention on Climate Change - UNFCCC (enacted by Federal Decree 2652/1998)
At issue
Whether the Minister of the Environment committed high crimes and misdemeanors (crime de responsabilidade) by failing to implement policy that proactively achieves Brazil's targets for reducing GHGs in violation of Brazil's international commitments to combat climate change, in particular the Paris Agreement.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
08/20/2021
Decision extinguishing the case for loss of grounds in view of Ricardo Salles' resignation from the position of Minister of the Environment (in Portuguese)
Decision
10/24/2019
Decision dismissing the case for lack of legal standing (in Portuguese)
Decision

Summary

On August 22, 2019, two congressmen, Fabiano Contarato and Randolph Rodrigues, and one congresswoman, Joenia Batista, filed a petition before the Federal Supreme Court to investigate political-administrative infractions leading to high crimes and misdemeanors (crime de responsabilidade) against Ricardo Salles, then-Minister of Environment of Brazil. The plaintiffs maintain that the public management of the defendant, as the head of the Ministry, was incompatible with the probity and decorum required of leaders in office. Among other decisions and omissions considered undignified, they allege the violation of international commitments ratified by the Brazilian government to combat climate change, in particular the Paris Agreement. They claim that the ministerial policy implemented by the defendant has not been proactive in achieving Brazil's targets for reducing Greenhouse Gases (GHGs). They affirm, in this sense, a lack of commitment to combating the illegal deforestation of the Amazon Rainforest. They also state that the budget of the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) has been cut, compromising its environmental monitoring and enforcement activities. Finally, they request that the then-Minister of the Environment be recognized as having committed high crimes and misdemeanors (crime de responsabilidade) and that he be removed from office and disqualified from holding public office for eight years. On October 24, 2019, Justice Edson Fachin held that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing and determined that the case should be dismissed. The plaintiffs then filed an Interlocutory Appeal in which they repeated the terms of the Petition, emphasizing that its legitimacy is supported by Article 14 of the Law of High Crimes and Misdemeanors (Lei dos Crimes de Responsabilidade – Law 1.079/1950), which allows any citizen to denounce a Minister of the State. In a subsequent decision from August 20, 2021, the Justice extinguished the case, ruling that the appeal had lost its grounds in view of the resignation of Ricardo Salles from the position of Minister of the Environment.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience