- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- North Dakota
- /
- Falkirk Mining Co. v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Falkirk Mining Co. v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Status report filed by defendants.
Geography
Docket number
1:24-cv-00040
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → D.N.D.
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims → NEPAFederal Statutory Claims → Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Mineral Leasing Act (MLA)United States → Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Coal mining company's lawsuit to compel federal defendants to complete their environmental review for an emergency coal lease application.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
04/28/2025
Status report filed by defendants.
The defendants reported that they had determined that an environmental assessment (EA) might be sufficient to discharge their obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act and that the Bureau of Land Management had completed a draft EA that it intended to make available by June 12, 2025.
Status Report
02/26/2025
Case stayed while new administration reviews the case.
Decision
02/29/2024
Complaint filed.
A coal mining company that submitted an application for an emergency coal lease sale in 2019 filed a lawsuit in federal district court in North Dakota to compel federal defendants to complete their environmental review for the lease application. The company alleged that federal defendants had told the company that the environmental assessment for its application could not move forward because the impact on greenhouse gases could not be analyzed because “no test currently exists to determine whether leasing the federal coal … will have a significant impact on global carbon dioxide emissions.” The company described the federal inaction as “inexcusably part of ‘what appears to be … a de facto moratorium’ concerning federal coal leasing.” The complaint asserted violations of the Mineral Leasing Act, the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, NEPA, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Complaint
Summary
Coal mining company's lawsuit to compel federal defendants to complete their environmental review for an emergency coal lease application.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience