- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Brazil
- /
- Amazonas
- /
- Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office v. José Barbosa de Araújo (Deforestation and climate damage in the PAE Antimary)
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
Brazil → Amazonas → Amazonas Federal Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Others (Global)
Principal law
Brazil → Federal Constitution of 1988Brazil → Forest Code (Law No. 12.651 of 2012)Brazil → ILO Convention 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (enacted by Decree No. 5.051 of 2004, later revoked by Decree No. 10.088 of 2019)Brazil → National Environmental Policy Act (Law No. 6.938 of 1981)Brazil → National Policy on Climate Change – PNMC (Federal Law No. 12.187 of 2009)Brazil → Paris Agreement (enacted by Federal Decree No. 9.073 of 2017)Brazil → UN Framework Convention on Climate Change - UNFCCC (enacted by Federal Decree 2652/1998)International Law → UNFCCC → Paris Agreement
At issue
Whether a Brazilian farmer is responsible for climate and environmental damages stemming from deforestation in the Amazon
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
09/09/2021
Petition
Summary
On September 9, 2021, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) filed a Civil Public Action (CPA) against José Barbosa de Araújo for deforesting an area of 127.56 hectares between 2011 and 2020, in Boca do Acre, Amazonas. The MPF alleges that the defendant's occupation of the land was illegal because it was part of an Agro-Extractivist Settlement Project (PAE), owned and managed by the National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA) and occupied by traditional extractivist communities. This ACP is part of a set of 22 lawsuits filed by the MPF as a result of the investigation carried out in Civil Inquiry No. 1.13.000.001719/2015-49 into illegal deforestation carried out inside the Antimary Agro-Extractivist Settlement Project (PAE) but against different defendants.
The lawsuit is based, among other things, on Brazilian environmental law concerning the constitutional protection of the environment, the accusation of deforestation, propter rem civil liability for environmental damage, including climate damage, and collective moral damages. It also mentions the unauthorized emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) caused by the illegal deforestation of the area, calculated at 76,359.16 tons of carbon dioxide and which are directly related to the Brazilian State's departure from its climate goals, out of step with national and international commitments made by Brazil in the National Policy on Climate Change - PNMC (Federal Law 12.187/2009) and in the Paris Agreement (promulgated by Federal Decree 9.073/2017). Among other requests: (i) reparation for the damage caused by illegal deforestation; (ii) payment of compensation corresponding to intermediate and residual material environmental damage; (iv) payment of compensation corresponding to climate damage; and (v) payment of compensation corresponding to collective moral damage.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance