Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Greater Hells Canyon Council v. Wilkes

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion largely granted and defendant ordered to prepare an EIS.
Docket number
2:22-cv-00859
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Oregon (D. Or.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United StatesNational Forest Management Act (NFMA)
At issue
Challenge to U.S. Forest Service approval of the Forest Plans Amendment to Forest Management Direction for Large Diameter Trees in Eastern Oregon and Southeastern Washington that allegedly would remove protections for large and old trees.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
03/29/2024
Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion largely granted and defendant ordered to prepare an EIS.
Decision
09/21/2023
Objections to findings and recommendations submitted by defendant-intervenors.
Objections
09/21/2023
Objections to findings and recommendation submitted by federal defendants.
Objections
08/31/2023
Magistrate judge recommended that plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment be granted in part and that federal defendants' and defendant-intervenors' motions be denied.
Report And Recommendation
01/20/2023
Brief filed by amicus curiae Nez Pierce Tribe in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Amicus Motion/Brief
12/27/2022
Motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs.
Motion For Summary Judgment
06/14/2022
Complaint filed.
Six groups challenged the U.S. Forest Service approval of the Forest Plans Amendment to Forest Management Direction for Large Diameter Trees in Eastern Oregon and Southeastern Washington, which the complaint alleged would remove “long-standing protections for large and old trees.” The plaintiffs alleged that the agency did not prepare an environmental impact statement and classified the amendment as “insignificant” under the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) despite, among other factors indicating significance, “the value of large trees as major and increasing stores of carbon that help mitigate climate change.” The plaintiffs asserted violations of National Environmental Policy Act, the NFMA, the Endangered Species Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to U.S. Forest Service approval of the Forest Plans Amendment to Forest Management Direction for Large Diameter Trees in Eastern Oregon and Southeastern Washington that allegedly would remove protections for large and old trees.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance