Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Greenpeace and Others v. Commission

Geography
International
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Pending
Geography
International
Court/admin entity
European UnionGeneral Court (known as Court of First Instance before 2010)
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Trade and Investment (Global)Climate-justified measures (Global)
Principal law
European UnionSecondary LawRegulationsCommission Delegated Regulation 2022/1214RegulationsTaxonomy Regulation 2020/852
At issue
Whether the inclusion by the Commission of gas and nuclear in the Taxonomy Regulation is unlawful.

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type

Summary

With the Taxonomy Regulation 2020/852, the European Union established the criteria for determining whether an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable for the purposes of establishing the degree to which an investment is environmentally sustainable, with the aim of facilitating sustainable investment. Articles 10(3) and 11(3) of the Taxonomy Regulation require the Commission to adopt delegated acts establishing the technical screening criteria for determining first the conditions under which a specific economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or adaptation, and second whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to one or more environmental objectives. In its Delegated Regulation 2022/1214, the Commission gave specific nuclear and gas energy activities a sustainable label. According to Greenpeace, the Commission’s act is not in line with the Taxonomy Regulation and violated the very idea of the Regulation. Nuclear activities, for example, pose significant harm to the environment, which is expressly prohibited by the Taxonomy Regulation.