Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Greenpeace Australia Ltd. v. Redbank Power Co.

Geography
Year
1994
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
1994
Status
Application dismissed
Court/admin entity
AustraliaNew South WalesLand and Environment Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Utilities (Global)
Principal law
AustraliaEcologically Sustainable Development (ESD) Principles
At issue
Challenge to state council decision granting development consent for a power station
Topics
, ,

Documents

Summary

An Australian state court upheld a state council decision granting development consent for the construction of a power station. Greenpeace asserted that air emissions from the power station would exacerbate the greenhouse effect. Applying the precautionary principle, Greenpeace argued that the court should refuse development consent for the project. The court held that although application of the precautionary principle dictates a cautious approach in determining whether or not development consent should be granted, the principle does not require that the greenhouse gas issue outweigh all other issues.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance